MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7119412954

Avaliação cognitiva da queixa de memória na atenção primária: estudo descritivo e longitudinal

2023· dissertation· pt· W7119412954 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marcos Leandro Pereira

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaCognitionMemory clinicAnxietyMoodDepression (economics)Cognitive disorderCognitive impairment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Memory complaints (MQ) are common in the elderly. It is essential to characterize them from a clinical, cognitive and psychiatric point of view, as well as investigate prognostic factors associated with conversion to dementia. This doctorate consists of two studies. The first (Study 1) aims to investigate the functional outcome of individuals with memory complaints and explore the risk factors associated with cognitive and functional declines. The second study aims to investigate the relationship between QM and symptoms of depression. Data from Study 1 were collected between 2016 and 2020 (average follow-up = 44.5 ± 6.8 months) in primary health care in Patos de Minas. Participants were assessed using cognitive tests, Neuropsychiatric Inventory and Functional Activities Questionnaire. The initial sample (2016) consisted of 91 participants, classified as Subjective Cognitive Decline (DCS n=15), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI, n=45) or Dementia (n=31). During follow-up, eight individuals died and 26 were not located. Fifty-seven participants underwent clinical reassessment. Of the 15 individuals with DCS (seven not localized, 46.7%), four (26.7%) progressed to MCI and four (26.7%) remained stable. Of the 45 individuals with MCI (eleven not localized, 24.4%), two (4.4%) died, six (13.4%) progressed to dementia, twelve (26.7%) regressed to DCS and fourteen (31.1%) remained stable. Of the 31 individuals with dementia (eight not localized, 25.8%), six (19.4%) died, two (6.5%) regressed to DCS, seven (22.6%) regressed to MCI, and eight remained stable (25.8%). The clinical improvement was due to the treatment of reversible causes, such as hypothyroidism, hypovitaminosis B12 and mood and anxiety disorders. The Study 2 sample consisted of 246 individuals, 77.2% of whom were women, with an average age of 67.2 years (±9.29) and average education of 7.39 years (±5.17). Participants were separated into two groups: with depression and without depression, according to their GDS (Geriatric Depression Scale) score. There was a statistically significant difference for the variables There was a statistically significant difference between the subgroups (depression vs without depression) in the variables Memory Complaints Questionnaire (MAC-Q, p=0.001), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE, p=0.006), Delayed Memory of the figure test ( p=0.030), Semantic Verbal Fluency (animals) (p=<0.001), Clock Drawing Test (p=0.018), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA, p=0.011), Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI, p= <0.001) and Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ, p=<0.001), with the worst cognitive performance in individuals with depression. The Study 2 sample consisted of 246 individuals, of which 77.2% were women, with an average age of 67.2 years (±9.29) and average education of 7.39 years (±5.17). Participants were separated into two groups: with depression and without depression, according to their GDS (Geriatric Depression Scale) score. The multinomial regression model revealed that having higher grades on the GDS (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.49 – 0.75; p <0.001), older ages (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.84 – 0.97; p=0.007), hypothyroidism (OR 20.15; 95% CI 1-92 – 211.00; p=0.012) and smoking (OR 9.34; 95% CI 2.93 – 2.97; p<0.001) are variables associated with cognitive decline/dementia. Furthermore, it was noticed that depression is associated with the female sex (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.20-0.94; p= 0.034) and anxiety (OR 37.91; 95% CI 12.31 – 116.76; p<0.001, while cognitive normality was associated with the absence of depression (OR 14.20; 95% CI 4.26 – 47.29, p < 0.001). The results of Study 1 reinforce the need for adequate screening and treatment of reversible causes of cognitive decline in primary care. In Study 2, age and education were variables associated with dementia. Depression was associated with cognitive deficits and functional decline, reinforcing the growing literature on the relevance of depression as an impact factor on the cognitive-functional performance of elderly people.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→