MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7119423978

Search for a new Z′ gauge boson via the pp → W±(*) → Z′μ±ν → μ±μ∓μ±ν process in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

2024· article· en· W7119423978 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nuno Filipe Castro, A. Onofre, ATLAS Collaboration

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCERNBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesAustrian Science FundAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloTRIUMF
KeywordsAtlas (anatomy)Large Hadron ColliderAtlas detectorBranching fractionDetectorGauge bosonATLAS experimentHadronBoson
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A search for a new \( Z' \) gauge boson predicted by \( L_\mu - L_\tau \) models, based on charged-current Drell–Yan production, \( p p \to W^{\pm(*)} \to Z' \mu^{\pm} \nu \to \mu^{\pm} \mu^{\mp} \mu^{\pm} \nu \), is presented. The data sample used corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 140 \, \text{fb}^{-1} of proton–proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} = 13 \, \text{TeV} \) recorded by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. The search examines a final state of \( 3 \mu \) plus large missing transverse momentum. Upper limits are set on the \( Z' \) production cross section times branching ratio in the mass range of 5–81 GeV. After combining with the previous \( Z' \) search using the neutral-current Drell–Yan production with a \( 4 \mu \) final state, the most stringent exclusion limits to date are achieved in the parameter space of the \( Z' \) coupling strength and mass.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho)Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207