MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7119477695 · doi:10.30649/ph.v25i2.420

Legal Issues Concerning Consumer Protection in Metaverse Operation in Nigeria: Taking a Leap from Uganda

2025· article· W7119477695 on OpenAlexaff
Esther Chetachukwu Aidonojie, Eregbuonye Obieshi, Olawumi Odeyinka-Apantaku, Ekpenisi Collinsd

Bibliographic record

VenuePerspektif Hukum · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI in Service Interactions
Canadian institutionsHalifax Regional Water Commission
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSafeguardingConsumer protectionGovernment (linguistics)MetaverseSafeguardSocial worlds

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Metaverse concept is a unique and trending digital platform, that has transformed commercial and social activities. Despite the prospect of Nigerian commercial activities in the Metaverse, it presents some unique challenges for consumers. Concerning this, the study examines the legal issues surrounding consumer protection in the Metaverse, to adopt possible legal ideas from Uganda’s experience, the study adopted a hybrid method of study, and 317 questionnaires were distributed to respondents residing within Nigeria. The results were analyzed with the aid of a descriptive and analytical approach. The study reveals that the metaverse concept provides significant prospects and potential for consumers. However, there are legal and social issues consumers may encounter. These challenges include a lack of legal measures in safeguarding consumer rights in the metaverse, the incidence of fraudulent activities by fraudsters, and several other challenges. It was therefore concluded and recommended that, for an effective operation of the metaverse that would not violate consumer rights, there is a need to incorporate an effective legal framework that will safeguard consumer interest. In this regard, the study recommends Uganda’s consumer protection laws as a model for the Nigerian government to adopt in safeguarding consumer commercial activities in the metaverse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePerspektif HukumSame topicAI in Service InteractionsFrench-language works237,207