Integrasi Kawasan Candi Plaosan Lor dan Candi Plaosan Kidul dengan Inovasi Desain Streetscape Koridor Komersial
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kawasan wisata Candi Plaosan memiliki koridor area komersial yang terbangun secara organik oleh masyarakat setempat. Candi Plaosan memiliki keunikan karena terpisah menjadi dua kompleks, Candi Plaosan Lor dan Candi Plaosan Kidul. Koridor area komersial wisata Candi Plaosan memiliki potensi untuk mengintegrasikan dua kompleks Candi Plaosan yang terpisah sebagai koridor penghubung antara dua kompleks candi tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk secara kritis mengkaji koridor area komersial jalan diantara Candi Plaosan Lor dan Kidul serta mengkaji inovasi streetscape yang dapat diterapkan pada koridor area komersial tersebut sehingga berdampak pada citra visual dan sosial ekonomi kawasan wisata Candi Plaosan. Peneliti menggunakan metode kualitatif melalui observasi lapangan, pemetaan fisik dan wawancara. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan adanya pemanfaatan koridor komersial yang mampu berimplikasi pada peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat namun demikian perlu adanya penataan yang memadai sehingga terintegrasi dengan Kawasan cagar budaya dan tidak merusak situs. Rekomendasi berupa inovasi streetscape di koridor tersebut terutama melalui lima aspek, yaitu feasibility, accessibility, safety, comfort, serta pleasure ability.Â
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it