MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7119493948 · doi:10.1115/icef2025-159250

Effect of Hydrogen Addition on the End-Gas Autoignition Process Using a Rapid Compression Machine

2025· article· W7119493948 on OpenAlexaff
Long Jin, Xiao Yu, Graham T. Reader, Ming Zheng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoignition temperatureHydrogenCombustionIgnition systemOctane ratingHomogeneous charge compression ignitionEngine knockingHydrogen fuelThermal efficiency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract To alleviate environmental concern, the deployment of low to zero carbon fuel is necessary for reducing the greenhouse gas emissions from internal combustion engines (ICEs). Dimethyl ether (DME) and hydrogen fuel are viable alternative energy sources that can replace petroleum-based fossil fuels, offering emission reductions. In addition, dual-fuel spark-assisted compression ignition (SACI) is an advanced combustion mode that offers precise control of the combustion phasing, extends engine operating range, and improves thermal efficiency. However, engine knocks are generated from end gas autoignition, which restricts the expansion of the high load limit. This study explores the knocking resistance of SACI combustion using the various ratio of hydrogen addition with DME/air mixtures in a rapid compression machine. The low autoignition temperature of DME fuel enables the DME/air mixtures to be readily ignited at the elevated temperature and pressure. Hydrogen fuel with a high octane number can be utilized to reduce the reactivity of the air-fuel mixture for knocking suppression, and the fast laminar flame speed leads to reduce energy density during the end-gas autoignition. The volume ratio of hydrogen is prepared from 10 to 90%, in order to observe the onset of the end-gas autoignition limits. The raw pressure measurement is analyzed to investigate the impact of hydrogen addition on knocking and ringing intensity from the generated pressure waves. The high-speed images are utilized to define the autoignition time to further compute the energy release during the residence and excitation periods, and the correlation of different stages of energy release is compared to explore the knocking behavior. The deflagration to detonation transition (DDT) is observed and identified via the non-dimensional parameter π.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCombustion and Detonation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207