MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7119494696 · doi:10.65264/ofmw4333

Article 9: Technology and Business as Strategic Partners-CSC’s Offender Management System Modernization (OMS-M) Project as a Case Study

2021· article· W7119494696 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Simon Bonk

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvancing Corrections Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModernization theoryBusiness process reengineeringBusiness system planningEmerging technologiesBridging (networking)Information technologyBusiness modelTechnology management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recognizing the opportunity to fundamentally change the way technology is supporting corrections, the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) is undergoing a modernization of their Offender Management System to enhance offender management throughout the correctional process. With technology and the business as strategic partners, CSC has been able to drive transformation by bridging business challenges with technology solutions. This paper will explore the sequence of events that led to CSC’s business investment, the conditions that must be in place for successful transformation, and explore some illustrative examples of potential emerging technologies that could be used to augment the capabilities of OMS in 2030, including case management, sentence calculation and cell placement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0180.008
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvancing Corrections JournalSame topicCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisFrench-language works237,207