MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7119507182 · doi:10.33423/jabe.v27i6.8053

Domestic Financial Architecture and Demand Side Intermediation Performance: Finametric Intertemporal Evidence From Nigeria

2025· article· W7119507182 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Charles Chekwa, Tony Emetu, Chinonye Onwuchekwa, Chinedu B. Ezirim

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Business and Economics · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBanking stability, regulation, efficiency
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinancial intermediaryDemand sideIntermediationMonetary policyReduction (mathematics)Financial analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed at unveiling the effects of the bank-based domestic architectural prescription on the demand side intermediation performance of banks in Nigeria. Finametric intertemporal long- and short-run modelling and estimations were made using the Johansen and Jusellius approach to cointegration, error-correction parameter estimation, and the VAR-Granger-causality/block-exogeneity-Wald tests. These were applied against quarterly data from 2010Q1 to 2022Q4. Results reveal that the architectural variables of MPR, SLR, and CRR jointly caused variations in the RCG demand side financial intermediation Performance of banks, both in the long- and short-runs. Individually, MPR negatively but strongly cause significant changes in the RCG performance, in both runs. SLR strongly and positively cause variations in RCG, in both runs. The CRR negatively, but does not affect RCG, in both runs. Policy options would include the systematic and carefully-timed reduction of the MPR (thereby, encouraging banks’ access to the discount window). Secondly, systematic and well-timed increase in the SLR would be a concerted policy alternative to the monetary authorities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Business and EconomicsSame topicBanking stability, regulation, efficiencyFrench-language works237,207