MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7119533936 · doi:10.82130/hs2025-02-005

Školní budovy na panstvích Hranice a Lipník nad Bečvou na konci 18. a počátku 19. století

2025· article· cs· W7119533936 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Helena Kovářová

Bibliographic record

VenueNPMK · 2025
Typearticle
Languagecs
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies of British Isles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)NegotiationWork (physics)Base (topology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The year 1774 marks the beginning of systemic changes in the school system, which also affected the area of material provision of school education. The establishment and expansion of the network of trivial schools primarily meant securing suitable spaces for teaching. In addition to adapting existing buildings, it was also necessary to build new ones, first in places where no school had been located before, and later to replace old and unsuitable ones. The initial research question was how this construction activity was financed in the region of Central Moravia defined by the borders of the neighboring estates of Hranice and Lipník nad Bečvou. The article deals primarily with the role of the owner of the dominion, who had obligations as a lord and as a patron of schools. Using examples of school buildings in individual municipalities, it presents the attitudes of the Dietrichstein princes, as well as the results of negotiations with the regional authority. The source base is the so-called school fasse and its comparison with the preserved agenda of the lord’s office. The study follows the development up to the first quarter of the 19th century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPMKSame topicHistorical Studies of British IslesFrench-language works237,207