High-Resolution Urban Land Cover Mapping from Satellite Imagery Using Deep Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate mapping of land cover and land use at very high resolution (VHR) is crucial for studying urban development and human-environment interactions. Deep learning techniques, particularly semantic segmentation models, have emerged as powerful tools for this task. However, their widespread application is hindered by the substantial demand for annotated VHR datasets. Nonetheless, their effectiveness is often constrained by the extensive volume of labeled VHR imagery required for training.. Existing studies have mostly used low to medium-resolution imagery and fewer bands, resulting in limited downstream applicability. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt at studying urban areas in Canada at such spatial resolution using self-supervised deep learning techniques. The objective is to classify VHR multispectral imagery into eight urban land cover categories. The main challenges are preparing analysis-ready data, class imbalance, and a limited amount of labeled data. To address these challenges, we introduce an innovative deep learning framework designed to improve spectral-spatial consistency while leveraging the wealth of available unlabeled data for more effective learning and easily apply pre-trained representations to downstream tasks. We perform super-resolution using deep learning pansharpening, then latent feature extraction without labels and knowledge distillation using a small amount of labeled data. The proposed workflow is applied to Worldview 3 imagery over 80,000 patches of size 256x256 at 1m spatial resolution. The methodology was applied to two unet variants, a simple Unet and an attention-gated Unet with a Resnet50 encoder. The results show that while the simple Unet could not adequately capture the complexity of the data, unlike the complex model, self-supervised pre-training improves the overall accuracy(OA) of the prediction in both cases. For simple Unet, the accuracy was improved from 69% to 74%, and for complex unet, the OA improved from 80% to 88%. In conclusion, we display the effectiveness of multi-view self-supervised semantic segmentation on multispectral VHR images and create a land cover product for future research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".