Historic Building Recording: Harefield Grove, Rickmansworth Road, Harefield, London
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In September and October 2018, KDK Archaeology Ltd carried out Historic Building Recording of Harefield Grove, Rickmansworth Road, Harefield, London to fulfil Condition 3 of Listed Building Consent for the development of the buildings on the site. The work was carried out included: � Main House: HE Level 4 (covered in a separate report (Kaye 2018)) � 20th century wings to the rear of the main house: photographic survey of the exterior of the buildings and the main reception area/atrium � Cottage: HE Level 3 n September and October 2018, KDK Archaeology Ltd carried out Historic Building Recording of Harefield Grove, Rickmansworth Road, Harefield, London to fulfil Condition 3 of Listed Building Consent for the development of the buildings on the site. The main house of Harefield Grove is a Grade II listed building dating to the early part of the 19th century and was overhauled and hugely extended in the early 1980s when the site became the headquarters for Initial Services Ltd. It has been vacant for several years, although used for film and photo shoots. The Cottage dates from 1873 and, despite having been considerably modernised in the 1980s, has remained unused for many years. This study has shown that many of the historical features in the house are modern replicas of or based on the originals that are mostly well executed, but using modern and largely inappropriate materials. The Stable Block and the Conservatory were completely rebuilt in the early 1980s. The original design of both buildings was used as a basis for the present structures, although the present Stable Block has a centrally located carriageway and arched windows that were lacking on the original.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".