MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7119815233 · doi:10.1353/jip.00034

Adler’s Indivisible Psychology Studied Through the Lens of His Jewish Ethnocultural, Intellectual, and Spiritual Life

2025· article· en· W7119815233 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marina Bluvshtein

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œjournal of individual psychology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicIdentity, Memory, and Therapy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJudaismPsychodynamicsPsychological TheoryAntisemitismReading (process)Quarter (Canadian coin)Close readingCulture theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: This three-part article shares a Jewish reading of Alfred Adler’s Individual Psychology. The first part examines Adler’s own spiritual and ethnocultural journey. The second part explores Judaic and Jewish cultural imprints in the spirit and the letter of Individual Psychology theory and practice. The third part is devoted to the core psychodynamics of antisemitism as one of the notable psychological phenomena in the development of Individual Psychological theory at the time the theory was developed and as it stays alive and active now. The third part concludes with an exploration of lifestyle themes in antisemitism. In all three parts, the author draws on existing psychological, historical, and social texts, including both archival and published scholarly works. The reader is encouraged to consider the dynamic explanatory intersection of all these layers, as they were important historical ingredients in the development of theory and remain critically important. As a matter of urgent concern for Individual Psychological theory and practice at the turn of the first quarter of the 21st century, the author invites readers to find their unique lifestyle responses to many conclusions and several significant questions posed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œjournal of individual psychologySame topicIdentity, Memory, and TherapyFrench-language works237,207