MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7119859300 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18202923

Pédagogie favorisant le bien-être psychologique de la communauté étudiante: guide pratique

2022· article· W7119859300 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christine Genest, Dania Ramirez, Guylaine Gauthier, Jessica Vaillancourt, Juan Torres, Kétura Daméus, Louise Demers, Lyse Turgeon, Marie-Hélène Girouard, Michelle McKerral, Nathalie Letarte, Sylvie Normandeau, Yara El Ayoubi, Université de Montréal

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeaning (existential)Quality of life (healthcare)Perspective (graphical)Distress

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pour citer ce document: Université de Montréal. (2022). Pédagogie favorisant le bien-être psychologique de la communauté étudiante : guide pratique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.199

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0060.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction→French-language works237,207→