Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ctenarytaina Ferris & Klyver, 1932 Type species: Ctenarytaina fuchsiae (Maskell) Key to adults of Ctenarytaina in French Polynesia 1 Head with genae conical, diverging, with more acute apices; forewing broad (ratio WL:WW <2.4) and remaining broad in apical half with broadly rounded apex, cell cu 1 higher and narrower (ratio CUR <2.5) with arching vein Cu 1a .................................................................... C. remota Tuthill, 1956 (on Hivaoa, Marquesas Islands) - Head with genae broad, converging and mostly contiguous with bluntly rounded apices; forewing narrower (ratio WL:WW> 2.4) and increasingly narrow in apical half to narrowly rounded apex, cell cu 1 lower and wider (ratio CUR> 2.5) with more or less straight vein Cu 1a.................................................................................. 2 2 Smaller species, length including wings <2 mm; head with vertex longer and narrower (ratio VL:VW> 0.5) and notably narrowed anteriorly, genae very short (see Fig. 1c in Tuthill 1942) (ratio VL:GC> 0.3)....................................................................................... C. lulla (Tuthill, 1942) (on Huahine, Society Islands) - Larger species, length including wings> 2 mm (Fig. 1N); head with vertex shorter and wider (ratio VL:VW <0.5), not notably narrowed anteriorly (Fig. 1G, 1H), genae longer (ratio VL:GC <0.3)........ C. elinae sp. nov. (on Tahiti, Society Islands)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".