Diseño ortopédico revisitado: Le Corbusier y L'Esprit nouveau, 1920-1925
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo revisa los principios de diseño ortopédico de Le Corbusier para presentar una serie de preocupaciones más generales sobre la higiene energética. Examinando el modo en que determinados objetos de diseño reflejan las preocupaciones emergentes de la psicología moderna, se demostrará cómo Le Corbusier veía las artes decorativas como una forma de gestionar el aspecto energético de la experiencia humana, previniendo crisis y aliviando la sobrecarga psicológica que define un conjunto de experiencias recién urbanizadas y cosmopolitas. Al enmarcar el diseño en el contexto más amplio de la higiene energética, el objetivo de este artículo es situar a Le Corbusier como un diseñador integral que respondió a las exigencias médicas y tecnocientíficas de la vida moderna.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".