MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7120172906 · doi:10.1097/hp.0000000000002041

Radiation Dose Reconstruction Using Q-Band EPR Analysis of Mini-biopsy Dental Enamel Samples

2025· article· en· W7120172906 on OpenAlexaff
Lekhnath Ghimire, Edward Waller

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRadiation Effects and Dosimetry
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiodosimetryElectron paramagnetic resonanceEnamel paintTooth enamelDosimeterRadiationHuman toothIrradiation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study focuses on recent advancements in biodosimetry using continuous wave (CW) Q-band electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy and mini-biopsy samples from tooth enamel. When radiation is absorbed, the carbonate impurities in enamel (i.e., hydroxyapatite) are changed into •CO2- (carbon dioxide radical anions), which become trapped within the crystal lattice and remain stable for durations far exceeding human lifespans. This stability makes tooth enamel an ideal material for assessing radiation doses in both accident and retrospective scenarios. In contrast to traditional, more invasive CW X-band EPR (9.8 GHz) methods, the CW Q-band EPR technique allows for the non-invasive (or minimally invasive) collection of smaller enamel fragments. This enables faster, more comfortable sampling. Operating at approximately 34 GHz, CW Q-band EPR offers enhanced sensitivity and a significantly improved signal to noise ratio (S/N) compared to CW X-band EPR. This increased sensitivity is crucial for detecting lower radiation doses in smaller samples, making it particularly useful for accurately identifying high-risk individuals in radiation triage situations. For this study, mini biopsies weighing around 2 mg were extracted from teeth and analyzed at room temperature using CW Q-band EPR. Calibration curves were established using reference doses, allowing the precise calculation of doses from signal intensity. Radiation doses higher than 100 mSv were estimated with high precision and accuracy. The combination of CW Q-band EPR spectroscopy and mini-biopsy sampling of tooth enamel provides a rapid, reliable method for dose assessment in radiation triage scenarios. This advancement is essential for developing efficient biodosimetry techniques, enabling the timely identification and management of individuals exposed to ionizing radiation during radiation incidents. Additionally, this method proves invaluable for retrospective dose reconstruction in cases of chronic exposure applicable to individuals, groups, or entire populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.644
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth PhysicsSame topicRadiation Effects and DosimetryFrench-language works237,207