Edward Palmer Thompson e a economia moral das multidões latino-americanas : Edward Palmer Thompson and the moral economy of Latin American crowds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay is intended to be an attempt to creatively apply the rich and complex concept developed by E. P. Thompson, 'the moral economy of the crowd', in the particular case of the recent mobilizations, protests and movements developed in Latin America in the last quarter of a century. So, after trying, initially, to define, rigorously, the so-called Thompsonian concept, we then proceed to analyze, from the contents of the so-called 'moral economy', the main current Latin American anti-systemic movements and, among them, the Mexican neozapatism, the Mapuche movement, from Chile, the Movement of the Landless, from Brazil, the movements of the Argentine piqueteros, the movement of the Ecuadorian CONAIE, or the Pachakutik Movement of Bolivia, among others. In addition, and always based on the intellectual tool represented by the concept coined by Thompson, it is a question of explaining and characterizing the recent general mobilization of the entire Ecuadorian people, in October 2019, the Colombian national strike, in November 2019, and the vast, and still active, mobilization of the Chilean insurgent people, which began on October 18th, 2019.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".