Entre repentes e sertões: presença, mudanças e continuidades da cantoria de viola no Seridó potiguar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The theme that covers this work is the singing of the viola in the sertão of the Potiguar Seridó, since it analyzes its presence in this territory, with an approach in the city of Caicó-RN, delimiting its changes and continuities throughout the 20th and 21st centuries. It also verifies the changes in writing about singing in works by folklorists, in addition to analyzing the set of sociocultural relations, rules and instruments that are used within viola singing, which determine its functioning. The theoretical debates are based on concepts from Oral History (ALBERTI, 1996; FERREIRA, 2012), Cultural History (BURKE, 2005; PESAVENTO, 2006; CHARTIER, 2002) and Popular Culture (ARANTES, 1987; CERTEAU, 1994), as well as dialogues and analyzes that depart from the concepts of genealogy, writing history and sertões. The sources used are oral, digital, literary, hemerographic, folkloric books and academic texts, as well as images and various documents present in the personal collections of poets from the municipality of Caicó. At the end of the research, it is clear that: viola singing has been active in Seridó since the second quarter of the 19th century and Caicó was the place where singers settled after the creation of the Violeiros do Seridó program in 1963; writing about singing changes, as do statements about singers; and there were changes and continuities in the face of technological demands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".