MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7120331188

Comparative study of endometrial resection and eletrocoagulation in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding

2014· dissertation· pt· W7120331188 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leonardo Abdala Elias

Bibliographic record

VenueUNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicUterine Myomas and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrocoagulationEndometrial ablationAblationMenstrual cycleHysteroscopyDysfunctional uterine bleedingProspective cohort studyEndometrium
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose of the study. Compare the results of two techniques of endometrial ablation first generation. Type of study. Prospective, longitudinal and analytical study (Canadian Task Force II-2). The study site. Tertiary public hospital, university teaching center. Patients and methods. During the period October 2011 to September 2013, 73 patients with a history of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and poor response to medical treatment for a minimum period of 12 months, were randomized and underwent endometrial ablation with monopolar resection electrode handle U followed by rollerball electrocoagulation with the group a (36 patients) with rollerball electrocoagulation only in group B (37 patients). The women were followed for an average period of 359 days (280;751) and 370 days (305;766), respectively. Interventions. The patients were submitted to endometrial ablation technique according to each group. Ratings at 30, 90, 180 and 360 days were accomplished through research protocol, which sought to assess the pattern of bleeding, associated symptoms, failure rate and satisfaction rate. Results. The groups were homogeneous clinical and epidemiologically (P ≥ 0.05). Surgical time and the volume of distension medium used were lower in group B patients [mean of 48.5 (±12.0) vs. 31.9 (±5.6) minutes; P < 0.001 and 5.700 mL vs. 3.500 mL; P < 0.01]. There was a significant improvement in clinical symptoms after endometrial ablation in both groups, reducing the number of bleeding days (P < 0.01), as well as the number of pads used on the day of the flow rate (P < 0.01) and throughout the menstrual cycle (P < 0.01). There was also a lower incidence of surgical site infection in group B (30.5% vs. 8.1%; P < 0.05). The hysterectomy rate observed in the study was 9.6%, due to technical difficulties and intraoperative hemorrhage, persistence of SUA, development of incapacitating dysmenorrhea and / or pelvic pain ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University)Same topicUterine Myomas and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207