MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7120331520

FIELD NOTES: Challenges and Approaches for Collecting Recent Material Heritage of Science and Technology

2015· article· pt· W7120331520 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Pantalony

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Catalana de Dret Públic · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Science and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)Field (mathematics)Cover (algebra)Tracing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At the Canada Science and Technology Museum, we have been putting more emphasis on collecting and researching recent material heritage. There are enormous challenges associated with size and scope, geographical coverage, ownership, privacy, complexity of components, tracing supply chains, transportation, available storage space, decisions about significance, proprietary knowledge, safety, preservation, and objects that are opaque and inaccessible to the untrained eye. In this paper, I cover a variety of case studies of contemporary collecting and the strategies we are developing to turn these challenges into opportunities for research and sharing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Catalana de Dret PúblicSame topicInternational Science and DiplomacyFrench-language works237,207