MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7120377686

A review of the taxonomy and fossil record of non-Protostegidae sea turtles from Cretaceous

2018· dissertation· en· W7120377686 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Isadora Gerheim de Vasconcellos Moreira

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCretaceousAptianTaxonomy (biology)Fossil RecordCladePhylogenetic tree
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fossil records of sea turtles from Cretaceous are found mainly in the clade Pan- Chelonioidea, but it also refers to a few species without a definitive phylogenetic relationship, currently considered Eucryptodira Indeterminate. The oldest record of Pan-Chelonioidea dates from the Aptian (Early Cretaceous) from Germany, which challenges the current hypothesis of the American origin for Americhelydia (Pan- Chelonioidea+ Chelydroidea) during the Campanian (Late Cretaceous). The records of Cretaceous marine turtles from the Old Word are scarce, but the distribution of stem Chelonioidea in North America were very abundant, following the coast of the Western Interior Seaway from Canada to south USA. All species of Pan-Chelonioidea from Cretaceous possessed limbs modified into paddles as adaptation for the marine environment, which allowed them to colonize small and large bodies of water. Their diet was variable, and the jaw specializations to shear and crush the food are present since the Late Campanian in stem Chelonioidea. Among the 45 named non- Protostegidae marine turtles from Cretaceous, 21 are nomina valida of Pan- Chelonioidea, 8 are nomina valida of Eucryptodira, 12 are nomina invalida, 5 are nomina nuda, 6 are nomina dubia, and 1 are nomen vanum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.010
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Same topicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology→French-language works237,207→