MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7120396851

Pleural mesothelioma in a rottweiler dog breed

2010· article· pt· W7120396851 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andréa Faraon, Ana Cláudia Tourrucôo, Kelly Cristini Rocha da Silva Ferreira, Rosemari Teresinha de Oliveira

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2010
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicOccupational and environmental lung diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLabrador RetrieverHistopathologyMesotheliomaHistopathological examination
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O mesotelioma é uma neoplasia difusa das membranas serosas da pleura, peritônio, pericárdio e túnica vaginal. É rara em todas as espécies animais. Os sinais clínicos apresentados são secundários ao acúmulo de efusão intracavitária característico deste tipo de tumor. Observam-se dispneia, aumento de volume abdominal, sinais de insuficiência cardíaca congestiva direita, entre outros. O diagnóstico definitivo é obtido através do exame histopatológico. Não existe tratamento efetivo. A cisplatina é a droga de escolha para a terapia paliativa. Neste trabalho é relatado um caso de mesotelioma pleural, diagnosticado na necropsia, em um cão macho da raça rottweiler. A doença apresentou-se rapidamente progressiva, havendo um curto intervalo desde o primeiro atendimento até o óbito do paciente. Clinicamente apresentava muita dispneia em função do acúmulo de efusão hemorrágica intrapleural, sendo a terapia adotada baseada nos sinais clínicos e exames complementares. É, sem dúvida, uma neoplasia com prognóstico bastante desfavorável.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Same topicOccupational and environmental lung diseases→French-language works237,207→