MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7120494201

Impact of the regulatory framework in the contemporary coastline urbanization: Camaçari (Brasil) and Asia (Peru)

2019· article· es· W7120494201 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nedda María Alejandra Noel Tapia

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American Urban Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)State (computer science)Quarter (Canadian coin)Context (archaeology)Center (category theory)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Las ciudades de América latina han sufrido grandes cambios demográficos, económicos, sociales, políticos, culturales y morfológicos, estos, en algunos casos son resultado de los lazos capitalistas dominantes y se han acentuado en las últimas tres décadas con el cambio al patrón neoliberal, que se caracteriza por una menor presencia del Estado, que actúa como un ente desregulador, flexibiliza los mecanismos, generoso con la inversión privada, donde prevalece el bien privado sobre lo público, y se promueven medidas que respaldan ese actuar; lo que ha tenido significativas implicancias en la estructura y gestión del espacio, en entre ellas la aparición o intensificación de formas urbanas. En ese sentido, esta investigación plantea profundizar en la tesis de Capel (1983), con el objetivo de establecer relaciones entre el proceso de urbanización contemporánea y el decisivo papel que desempeña el Estado como ente regulador y planificador, a través del estudio del marco normativo, en dos áreas de litoral de América Latina, Asia, Perú y Camaçari, Brasil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicLatin American Urban StudiesFrench-language works237,207