A feminae oeconomicus no Brasil: uma gestão empresarial de si na mídia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the exploration of economic rationality, Michel Foucault (2022) identifies a new subjectivity governed by market logics: the self-made entreprise, or homo oeconomicus. Rejecting universals and focusing on gender, this research outlines the concept of feminae oeconomicus, a woman who is entrepreneur of herself. The study aims to analyze the formation of this feminae oeconomicus subjectivity, grounded in a Foucauldian archaeogenealogy, towards an ontology of the present. To achieve this, we examine the model of feminae oeconomicus to understand its continuities and ruptures, based on discursive materiality, identifying points of intersection; we discuss the one‟s modeling through media in a management of the self, for the governance and surveillance of bodies; and we identify points of dispersion, escape routes, towards a new art of living. The starting point emerges as a glimpse, considering the study by Rago (2019b), which indicates a gap in the production of subjectivity within a traditionally valued feminine identity. Following this lead, we investigate the construction of feminae oeconomicus subjectivity through an analysis of neoliberalism (Dardot & Laval, 2016), questioning the position of women from an economic perspective (Federici, 2017, 2019; Marçal, 2022; Oksala, 2019; Saffioti, 2013), not for empowerment, but for genuine emancipation. Divided into three stages, the study interposes analytical practice with theoretical-methodological assumptions, moving through media biases in their gendered spaces (Lauretis, 1987), such as newspapers, magazines, advertisements, soap operas, and digital social networks, understanding the statement in its semiological condition. Through an archival description, we inquire into its forms of expressibility; conservation and memory; reactivation and appropriation (Foucault, 2013a). In the journey through the media discourse that permeates us, we encounter a body that is banned, liberated, and mechanized, shaped by the designs of capital.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".