A proposal for an Arts curriculum, based on the Pedagogy of Liberation, for young people living on the outskirts of the city center of São Paulo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta pesquisa tem como objetivo analisar a práxis em Arte - educação, a partir de uma visão crítica de currículo de base freiriana, que visa a contribuir com a construção de identidades de jovens moradores das periferias do centro da cidade de São Paulo. Esta análise foi realizada especialmente no Projeto Eixos, no Programa Juventudes do Sesc Bom Retiro. A investigação inscreve-se nos parâmetros da abordagem qualitativa, com pesquisa bibliográfica e autoetnografia, complementada por entrevistas semi-estruturadas a jovens e a educadores que participaram do Projeto Eixos. O referencial teórico fundamenta-se em Freire (1981, 1983, 1992, 2001, 2003, 2008, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2022), Freire e Shor (2008) e em autores que dialogam com Freire: Barbosa (2021, 2012, 2010, 1991), Boal (2000, 2009), Cusicanqui (2018, 2010), Dardot, Laval (2016); Fanon (1968), Gimeno-Sacristán (1998), Hissa (2012), Martins (1998, 2012), Oliveira (2021), Santos (1994, 2011), Saviani (2021), Souza Neto (2003, 2005, 2023) e Valenzuela (2015). A autoetnografia contou com informações presentes em documentos escritos, fichas de observação, vídeos, áudios e fotos. Esta pesquisa pode oferecer contribuições ao que vem sendo investigado na área de currículo em Arte - educação, junto a jovens das camadas populares, porque construiu e desenvolveu uma prática didático- pedagógica, que provocou análises e reflexões sobre o fazer docente, com vistas a elaborar um currículo crítico com bases freirianas, evidenciando uma opção teórico-metodológica contra-hegemônica, com seus limites e possibilidades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".