MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7120518499

Alvenaria estrutural de concreto: modelagem numérica, desempenho sísmico, e aplicações em edifícios

2025· dissertation· en· W7120518499 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rodolfo de Azevedo Palhares

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMasonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcementNonlinear systemMasonryStiffnessPierNumerical modelsStructural systemReinforced concrete
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partially grouted reinforced masonry (PGRM) structures are widely used worldwide, especially in regions with low to moderate seismicity, due to their economic and structural advantages. The nonlinear behavior of PGRM walls is complex, as it is influenced by the interaction between grouted/reinforced and ungrouted regions, which differ in stiffness and introduce non-uniformity in the cross-section. Additionally, factors such as aspect ratio, cross-sectional area, material properties, reinforcement detailing, and axial load significantly influence the nonlinear response. At the building level, further complexities arise from layout configurations, horizontal diaphragm interactions (slabs), and axial load distributions, making it insufficient to rely solely on isolated wall responses to predict overall performance. This thesis addresses these complexities by developing numerical modeling approaches to simulate multi-storey PGRM walls, with the aim of evaluating the seismic performance of building systems and propose practical design recommendations. The research comprises four independent but interconnected studies, each presented as a separate chapter in this thesis. In the first study, a simplified macro-modeling approach is evaluated to simulate the nonlinear in-plane behavior of PGRM walls with vertical reinforcement concentrated at the pier ends. The model, validated based on experimental data from four walls tested by the author’s research group, accurately predicted global behavior, including force-displacement responses and damage mechanisms, while presenting low computational costs. However, further refinement and validation are needed to address additional detailing scenarios, such as cases where vertical reinforcement and grouted regions are not continuous across stories or where reinforcement and grout are distributed non-uniformly along the wall length. In the second study, a unified finite element-based modeling strategy is introduced that combines macro-modeling for grouted regions and simplified micro-modeling for ungrouted regions. This approach facilitates the accurate simulation of various masonry wall typologies, including unreinforced masonry (URM), fully grouted reinforced masonry (FGRM), and PGRM. The numerical model effectively captured the nonlinear response across different experimental cases, and sensitivity analyses identified key parameters that influence numerical accuracy. This study provides valuable insights for future applications in the simulation of in-plane loaded masonry structures. The third study extends the unified modeling approach to investigate the seismic behavior of multi-storey PGRM walls within three-dimensional structural systems. Nonlinear static (pushover) analysis results revealed the significant impact of orthogonal walls (flanges), aspect ratios, axial load levels, and vertical reinforcement arrangements. Flanges have been shown to increase lateral stiffness and force capacity, higher axial loads enhance force capacity but reduce ductility, and a greater number of stories decreases stiffness and increases ultimate displacement. The vertical reinforcement concentrated at the wall ends exhibited an efficiency comparable to uniformly distributed reinforcement, demonstrating it as a suitable alternative. In the fourth study, the seismic performance of two real-world reinforced masonry buildings representative of Canadian (B1) and Brazilian (B2) practices is examined. Using a multi-step methodology that integrates eigenvalue analyses and pushover simulations, the study highlighted the critical role of structural layout in the seismic performance of buildings. Balanced wall distribution and flange contributions significantly improved performance. Notably, building B2, despite lacking explicit seismic design provisions and detailing, outperformed B1 under higher seismic demands, underlining the importance of optimized structural layouts in enhancing seismic performance. Overall, this thesis establishes a comprehensive framework for evaluating and improving the seismic performance of concrete masonry buildings. The proposed modeling approaches, validated based on experimental data, provide support for analyzing masonry systems and informing potential updates to seismic design standards. The findings emphasize the importance of regional adaptations in building design and structural layout optimization to achieve better seismic performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicMasonry and Concrete Structural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207