MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7120553423

Medicare Primer

2013· report· en· W7120553423 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patricia A. Davis, Scott R. Talaga, Cliff Binder, Jim Hahn, Suzanne M. Kirchhoff, Morgan, Paulette, C., Sibyl Tilson

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · 2013
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpouseMedicaidGovernment (linguistics)Disability insuranceSocial securityPaymentSocial Security ActHealth careQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medicare is a federal program that pays for covered health care services of qualified beneficiaries.It was established in 1965 under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide health insurance to individuals 65 and older, and has been expanded over the years to include permanently disabled individuals under 65.Medicare, which consists of four parts (A-D), covers hospitalizations, physician services, prescription drugs, skilled nursing facility care, home health visits, and hospice care, among other services.Generally, individuals are eligible for Medicare if they or their spouse worked for at least 40 quarters in Medicare-covered employment, are 65 years old, and are a citizen or permanent resident of the United States.Individuals may also qualify for coverage if they are a younger person with a permanent disability, have End-Stage Renal disease (permanent kidney failure requiring dialysis or transplant), or have amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease).The program is administered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and by private entities that contract with CMS to provide claims processing, auditing, and quality oversight services.In FY2013, the program will cover approximately 52 million persons (43 million aged and 9 million disabled) at a total cost of about $606 billion, accounting for approximately 3.7% of GDP.Spending under the program (except for a portion of administrative costs) is considered mandatory spending and is not subject to the appropriations process.Services provided under Parts A and B (also referred to as "traditional Medicare"), are generally paid directly by the government on a "fee-for-service" basis, using different prospective payment systems or fee schedules.Under Parts C and D, private insurers are paid a monthly "capitated" amount to provide enrollees with at least a minimum standard benefit.Medicare is required to pay for all covered services provided to eligible persons, so long as specific criteria are met.Since 1965, the Medicare program has undergone considerable change.For example, during the 111 th Congress, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA; P.L. 111-148 and P.L. 111-152) made numerous changes to the Medicare program that modify provider reimbursements, provide incentives to increase the quality and efficiency of care, and enhance certain Medicare benefits.However, in the absence of further congressional action, the Medicare program is expected to be unsustainable in the long run.The Hospital Insurance (Part A) trust fund has been estimated to become insolvent in 2024.Additionally, although the Supplementary Medical Insurance (Parts B and D) trust fund is financed in large part through federal general revenues and cannot become insolvent, associated spending growth is expected to put increasing strains on the country's competing priorities.As such, Medicare is expected to be a high-priority issue in the 113 th Congress, and Congress may consider a variety of Medicare reform options ranging from further modifications of provider payment mechanisms to redesigning the entire program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6300.405

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas)French-language works237,207