Study of the dynamics present in the rings of the Encke Fault and in the main ring of Jupiter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Falha de Encke, com 320 km de largura, se encontra no interior do anel A de Saturno. Esta falha possui quatro anéis, chamados de anel interno, anel central, quarto anel e anel externo, cujos centros são localizados em 133484 km, 133584 km, 133680 km, e 133720 km, respectivamente, a partir do planeta (HEDMAN et al., 2013), além de abrigar um satélite natural em seu interior co-orbital ao anel central, o satélite Pan. Nosso objetivo será analisar os efeitos que a força de radiação solar em conjunto com três dos coeficientes gravitacionais de Saturno (J2 , J4 , J6 ) terão sobre os anéis da Falha de Encke com de simulações numéricas realizadas através do integrador REBOUND. Foi verificado que partículas de raio de 1µm são rapidamente removidas do sistema da Falha de Encke devido a força de radiação solar e que as partículas de raio de 50µm são as mais estáveis. Também verificamos como o anel principal de Júpiter se comporta considerando as perturbações devido a não esfericidade do corpo central, força de radiação solar, e o efeito gravitacional de um satélite, no caso, Métis. As partículas do anel principal de Júpiter são menores que as da Falha de Encke, possuindo raios entre 1µm e 18µm segundo Brooks et al. (2004). Nesse trabalho verificamos que as partículas do anel principal de Júpiter mais próximas ao limite interior do anel transitam entre o anel principal e o Halo. Além disso, verificamos que o satélite Métis perturba as partículas menores do anel até serem removidas para os anéis Gossamer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".