MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7120563876

Epidemiology of canine obesity: risk factors and complications

2018· dissertation· pt· W7120563876 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Camila Debastiani

Bibliographic record

VenueUNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Medicine and Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpidemiologyObesityRisk factorOverweightPhysical activityDisease
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A obesidade é a doença nutricional mais frequente em animais de companhia que pode ser causada ou influenciada por fatores de risco, ambientais ou genéticos. O tecido adiposo é um órgão endócrino que secreta substâncias que podem apresentar-se em desequilíbrio no organismo obeso. Isso gera um prejuízo a saúde animal e pode desencadear várias comorbidades. Com a finalidade de identificar fatores de risco e principais complicações associadas a obesidade canina foram aplicados questionários on-line e físicos a tutores de cães, totalizando 1303 participações. Dos tutores entrevistados 25% consideraram que seus cães apresentavam sobrepeso ou obesidade. Os fatores de risco identificados para a obesidade relacionados ao animal foram: idade do animal (7-8 anos), raça (Labrador, Poodle, etc), sexo (fêmeas), esterilização, pouca disposição, pouca prática de atividade física, baixa duração da atividade, apetite voraz, dor e dificuldade de locomoção e uso de medicações (corticoide, fenobarbital e anticoncepcionais). Quanto aos tutores: idade (>60 anos), estado civil (divorciado), morar sozinho. As complicações que apresentaram correlação com obesidade foram: dermatopatias em geral, pele oleosa, descamação da pele, alergopatia, otopatia, claudicação, doença articular, tumor, tártaro, tosse, ronco, cansaço fácil e poliúria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University)Same topicVeterinary Medicine and SurgeryFrench-language works237,207