MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7120576030

Aumento de interferom gama no aborto recorrente:uma revisão sistemática

2020· article· pt· W7120576030 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sirlene Célia Pereira Rosa

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive System and Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeciduaMiscarriageImmune systemTrophoblastAbortionInclusion and exclusion criteriaRecurrent miscarriageFertility
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Embryo implantation is a high complex phenomenon involving hormonal changes in the mother, affecting immune response and the events of embryonic maturation. If such events are not synchronized there may be gestational losses. The embryo behaves in the maternal organism as a semi-allogenic graft, and is thus vulnerable to rejection and immune tolerance mechanisms. Trophoblast cells and endometrial cells synthesize one or more interferon, including IFN-γ (proinflammatory cytokine). The literature suggests that the cause of recurrent miscarriage is alloimmune rejection of the fetus. The presente study aimed tosystematically review the literature to investigate the association between IFN-γ levels and the occurrence of abortion As a methodology a systematic review was carried out on the association between interferon gamma and recurrent abortion. To analyze the quality of the studies, it was based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale; the levels of evidence from the studies were established by the classification of degrees of recommendation proposed by the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine; and for statistical analysis, meta-analysis was used.A search was carried out in 15 databases, finding a total of 7.464 studies were searched, after following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 48 studies were left for a detailed analysis, of which 10 articles, case controls, were eligible for this review, 4 studies inclueded for meta-analysis. In these articles, It was identified that all participants were of fertile age and also it was used as evaluation method the flow cytometry and Enzymatic Imunoadsorption Assay for interferon gamma found in the peripheral blood, decidua and endometrium. Regarding the quality of studies, all presented good quality, with moderate degree of evidence. The studies included in the meta-analysis showed high heterogeneity. However, the individual effect observed in all studies included in the meta-analysis, as well as the general effect estimate, indicated that the deciduous cells of pregnant women with a history of recurrent abortion produce significantly higher levels of IFNγ compared to the production of this cytokine in pregnant women without history of abortion. Although studies suggests an increase in IFNγ in cases of recurrent abortion further research are necessary with robust data to reinforce our results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.005
Bibliometrics0.0110.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicReproductive System and PregnancyFrench-language works237,207