Preencher os vazios: o papel da estrutura fundiária na constituição do espaço urbano de Cascavel - das primeiras presenças à década de 1960
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cascavel has its initial-historical records of occupation dated from the nineteenth century, when the first obrageras companies established in the region and the State attracts foreign capital by granting land in exchange of colonization and infrastructure works (railroad). However, since the sixteenth century caigangues and guaranis indians occupies the region of the Parana river banks, and were discovered by explorers advancing to the region through the old way of Peabiru. Later, new occupation initiatives emerge with the creation of the Foz do Iguaçu?s military village, the so called Strategic Road and the arrival of caboclos that already were entering the region through the trail-old entries. The national issue comes into evidence in the first quarter of the twentieth century with the Tenentista´s Movement, and the State seeks to recover the border´s territory, culminating in the March to the West. This is the post-1930 scenario, where the initial State measurements and demarcations of plots in Gleba Cascavel occur as well as the implantation of non urban settlement-the Patrimônio Velho-in the area that was already regionally known as Crossroads. The long trajectory of occupation and appropriation of the territory generates land conflicts noticed since the last century, which hinder any attempt of organization of the territory, until at last the 1950s, when finally occurs the demarcation of rural lots and the creation of the Patrimônio Novo. Thenceforth, Cascavel follows an urbanization process, resultant of economic and demographic dynamics, marked by the action of private agents, achieving the end of the 1960?s with 33 new allotments. This is the process analyzed in this study, from a theorical framework on the character of Brazilian modernization subsequent to 1930 and the land issue, along with surveys in bibliographic and documentary sources directed by an approach of the urban space production process, from its constitution by successive forming processes of full and empty spaces, on which the conception of the city as commodity occupies a central position. Thus, seeks to contribute to Cascavel´s urbanization historiography through the analysis of the role of the land structure in the production of the urban space and the identification of its agents
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".