MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7120589664

Determinação de metais potencialmente tóxicos em amostras de água e sedimentos nas bacias dos rios Cuiabá e São Lourenço - MT

2014· dissertation· pt· W7120589664 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paulo Eduardo Reinach da Silva Gonçalves

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy metals in environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSedimentWater qualityBiotaSurface waterContaminationHydrology (agriculture)Atomic absorption spectroscopyAquatic ecosystemHuman health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contamination of water resources is directly linked to anthropic activities. Some of these activities can release metals in the environment which, once in the water, cause great concern since they are not biodegradable, can accumulate in the biota and so reach critical levels causing adverse effects to human health and to the environment. The watersheds of Cuiabá and São Lourenço rivers are of great importance since their water is applied to multiple uses, involving the main municipalities of Mato Grosso State. Moreover they are the main affluent of Paraguay river which is the most important contributor to the Pantanal of Mato Grosso. Thus, this study aimed to determine the concentration of Cu, Cr, Cd, Mn, Fe, Pb and Zn in surface water and riverbed sediment of Cuiabá and São Lourenço watersheds. Metals were analysed in water using flame atomic absorption spectrometry and inductive couple plasma emission spectrometry and in sediment using flame atomic absorption spectrometry. The metal concentrations in water were compared to the maximum allowed values established in the Resolution CONAMA n. 357/2005 for class II river waters while for sediments the values established by the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) were used for comparison. The hierarchical cluster analysis revealed the existence of four groups regarding water quality and two groups of sediment. Discriminant analysis (DA) was applied to evaluate the grouping quality showing a correct classification of 80% of water and 79% of sediment samples. A análise de agrupamento hierárquica (AHA) revelou a existência de quatro agrupamentos para as amostras de água e dois agrupamentos para as amostras de sedimento. Moreover, DA in stepwise forward mode showed that it was possible to reduce the number of evaluated variables keeping the same efficiency in the groups classification. Exceedence curves showed that the majority of metal concentrations were below the limits established in the legislation. However, especial attention should be given to Pb and Cr that were detected in concentrations above these limits in water as well as in sediment samples in some sampling points, probably related to anthropic activities such as domestic and industrial effluents discharge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Same topicHeavy metals in environment→French-language works237,207→