Análise visual de tópicos no Twitter em conexão com debates políticos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Social media channels such as Twitter and Facebook often contribute to disseminate initiatives that seek to inform and empower citizens concerned with government actions. On the other hand, certain actions and statements by governmental institutions, or parliament members and political journalists that appear on the conventional media tend to reverberate on the social media. This scenario produces a lot of textual data that can reveal relevant information on governmental actions and policies. Nonetheless, the target audience still lacks appropriate tools capable of supporting the acquisition, correlation and interpretation of potentially useful information embedded in such text sources. In this scenario, this work presents two system for the analysis of government and social media data. One of the systems introduces a new visualization, based on the river metaphor, for the analysis of the temporal evolution of topics in Twitter in connection with political debates. For this purpose, the problem was initially modeled as a clustering problem and a domain-independent text segmentation method was adapted to associate (by clustering) Twitter content with parliamentary speeches. Moreover, a version of the MONIC framework for cluster transition detection was employed to track the temporal evolution of debates (or clusters) and to produce a set of time-stamped clusters. The other system, named ATR-Vis, combines visualization techniques with active retrieval strategies to involve the user in the retrieval of Twitters posts related to political debates and associate them to the specific debate they refer to. The framework proposed introduces four active retrieval strategies that make use of the Twitters structural information increasing retrieval accuracy while minimizing user involvement by keeping the number of labeling requests to a minimum. Evaluations through use cases and quantitative experiments, as well as qualitative analysis conducted with three domain experts, illustrates the effectiveness of ATR-Vis in the retrieval of relevant tweets. For the evaluation, two Twitter datasets were collected, related to parliamentary debates being held in Brazil and Canada, and a dataset comprising a set of top news stories that received great media attention at the time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".