MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7120608551

Relationship between MTM (midnight temperature maximum) and virtual height of layer F.

2013· dissertation· pt· W7120608551 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. A. O. B. Figueiredo

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and biological studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLayer (electronics)Tilt (camera)TheodoliteBase (topology)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Observações da emissão noturna da aeroluminescência do 01 630,0 nm, utilizando o interferômetro de Fabry-Perot, permitiram medir vento termosférico, intensidade relativa e temperatura, em São João do Cariri (7,4°S; 36,5°0) e Cajazeiras (6,9°S; 38,6°0), Paraíba. Neste trabalho tambem foram utilizados dados de Digisonda, localizada em Euzebio (3,9°S; 38.4°0), Ceara, e CADI (Canadian Advanced Digital lonosonde) instalada em São João do Cariri. Os dados de ventos, intensidade, temperatura e altura virtual da camada F, foram obtidos durante o ano de 2011, quando a atividade solar esteve em crescimento moderado, e o fluxo solar entre 90 e -155 10~22W i m21 Hz. Verificou-se que, no inicio da noite, o vento meridional apresenta uma magnitude de ~70 m/s em ambos os solstícios, mas as direções de escoamento são diferentes. No inverno, o escoamento e para os polos e no verão para o equador, o que contribui diretamente para o surgimento do MTM (Máxima temperatura da meia noite). Já o comportamento da altura da base da camada F apresenta, no verão e solstícios, um pico pre-reversão no início da noite, fato que não ocorre durante o inverno; o minimo da altura foi observado no mesmo horário do pico do MTM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicEnvironmental and biological studiesFrench-language works237,207