MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7120618448

Feelings and perspectives lived deeply by the primipara adolescent with regard to childbirth

2011· article· pt· W7120618448 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Janaína Fonseca Victor, Elizabeth Moreira Mota, Mirna Fontenele de Oliveira, Ana Karina Bezerra Pinheiro

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2011
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingChildbirthVitalityMeaning (existential)Qualitative researchPregnancyQuarter (Canadian coin)Health professionals
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work aimed to know the feelings and expectations lived by first time pregnant adolescents in the third quarter of pregnancy regarding childbirth. It was a qualitative study carried out in January and February 2007 in the prenatal clinic of the municipal district of Maracanaú-CE-Brazil. Data were collected through interview carried out with 20 adolescents. The following categories were verified: pain — meaning of giving birth; feeling insecure; fear of what might happen with the baby; and need of orientation. The results showed that most of the pregnant women, when identify pain as an outstanding feeling in the delivery process, reveals fear facing the discomfort that such pain can provoke, besides fear facing baby’s vitality and doubts on how to raise the baby. The pregnant adolescent faces biological and psycho-social changes, being essential the health professionals’ sensitization regarding the importance of childbirth for the mother and family.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsFrench-language works237,207