Abordagem fisioterapêutica na força muscular de indivíduos com artrite reumatoide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis is a rheumatic, inflammatory, systemic, chronic disease of unknown etiology that affects synovial tissues, leading to deformities and movement limitations, impairing daily and work activities. Physiotherapy plays a crucial role in the management of rheumatoid arthritis, providing pain relief, improving muscle and joint function and bringing benefits to patients' quality of life, being essential to combat the discomfort caused by the pathology. The objective of this study is to verify the effects of a physiotherapeutic intervention program on the handgrip strength of individuals diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis. This is a longitudinal and interventional study, which was carried out at the Physiotherapy course teaching clinic at the University of Passo Fundo (UPF). The initial sample consisted of 12 individuals (2 of which dropped out during the study), totaling 10 individuals. The first moment was the initial assessment, which consisted of the application of sociodemographic and health questionnaires, medication records, vital sign assessments, anthropometric measurements, Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS), Kratos® Manual Dynamometer for muscle strength, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). The intervention program consisted of 15 physiotherapy sessions, held twice a week, lasting 50 to 60 minutes each. The intervention involved mobility, flexibility, muscle strength, balance and gait exercises, encompassing functional movements of the entire body. The series of kinesiotherapy exercises were gradually increased in number and repetitions over the 15 sessions, according to the participants' tolerance. The results demonstrated that the majority of the sample was female, white, with an average age of 58.5 years. The intervention demonstrated statistically significant results in pain, which was not observed when analyzing handgrip strength parameters. It is concluded that the physiotherapeutic intervention program demonstrated to be effective in reducing pain in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".