MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7120670763

Ibn 'Asakirova povijest grada Damaska: Slavno dostignuće muslimanske historiografije

2003· article· sr· W7120670763 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahmet Alibašić

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2003
Typearticle
Languagesr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingIslamMiddle AgesWork (physics)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work is an attempt to present one of the great achievements in the Muslim historiography, Ibn Asakir’s History of the city of Damascus. After the author’s short biography, the work analyzes the content of History, its methodology, structure of biographies, its sources and im- pact on later Muslim historiography. Contemporary of Nuruddin ez-Zenki and Salahuddin Ejjubi, Ibn ‘Asakir (d. 1176) was a historian, great traveler, Shafi’i lawyer, poet, activist, Ash’arite theologian, professor of daru ‘l-hadis (school of hadith) and, above all muhaddis. Apart from his hometown Damascus, he was educated in Mecca, Medina, Kufa, Baghdad, Horasan, Isfahan, Transoxani, Merv, Tabriz, Bejhek, Nishapur, Herat and Mosul. He had over 1300 male teachers (shejks) and around 80 female teachers, which in fact were the sources of his Tarih. He authored 143 works. Ibn ‘Asakir started to write Tarih between years 525 and 529 of Hijra and he was doing it until the last days of his life. Just before his death he wrote the introduction to this work. His son Qasim did the last editorial work on Tarih which is, apart from other, incorporation of the ‘Asakir’s notes from the margins into the main text. This eighty- volume work with about 7000 biographies has been only partially published, thanks to the effort done by Academy of Ara- bic language from Damascus, but still none of the works have been completed yet. The Academy has published around twenty volumes (with 353-527 pages without introduction and indexes which, usually had around the same number of pages). Lately, publishing of this work has been taken over by the publishing house Mu’essesetu ‘r-risale from Beirut, with whom quality of the publication became visible. If they continue with such rhythm, today’s Muslim institutions will need some hundred and thirty years to complete the preparation and publishing of work, which was written by one person in the 12 century! Tarihu medineti Dimasq ve zikru fadliha ve tesmijetu men halleha mine ‘l-emasil ev idstaze bi nevahiha min varidiha ve ehliha is a biographic vocabulary similar to Tarihu Baghdad of El-Hatib el-Bagdadi. Tarih could be divided into two parts: introduction about importance, topography and history of Damascus and general remarks about history as a science, and main part, which began with the biography of Prophet (p.b.u.h.). Generally, Ibn ‘Asakir prefers to give information rather than comments. The biographies are different in length. In principle, one biography posses the following elements: full name (if it is known), some of hadith which that person transmitted, news about his appearance and behavior, something about social and political relations, the activities of the person and date of death. Very often in the first transmission after the name of a particular person Ibn ‘Asakir gives reason why such person has been included in Tarih. Mostly the biographies are long because of the long citation of different seneds which does not give much new information. Tarih is the one of the last works that gives the citation of seneds for transmission. While preparing Tarih Ibn ‘Asakir has used hundreds of sources but he did not mention their titles. Instead of that he usually gives sened, which is according to hadith methodology. Tarih was very influential in Islamic historiography, what is visible through wide circulation of this work, the fact that Muslim scholars were full of praise for him and the emergence of a few summaries of this work as well. We are fortunate that we have today preserved and already published a summary of History, which was prepared by a well-known lexicographer Ibn Menzur. Even though, by structure this work belongs to the category of biographical dictionaries, Ibn ‘Asakir’s work is in fact the cultural history of the whole of Syria from its early days to the last days of the authors’ life and as such, it presents indispensable source for the history of that part of the Muslim world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.637
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.241
GPT teacher head0.535
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicIslamic Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207