EXPERIÊNCIAS EMOCIONAIS DA GRAVIDEZ NA ADOLESCÊNCIA: ENTRE EXPECTATIVAS E CONFLITOS.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Given that there is an overvaluation of youth culture in our society today, a pregnancy at this stage of discovery can be somewhat impactful on the lives of adolescents. This article aims to understand the experience, expectations and anxieties of adolescents during their gestational period. Three adolescents, aged between 16 and 17 years old, who were in the waiting room of the self-risk pregnancy sector of the Regional Hospital of Assisi, participated in the research. pregnant women. The research instrument used was a semi-structured interview and the application of the drawing-story procedure with theme. The methodology used was based on qualitative research with case study design. Three thematic categories of content analysis were listed: the discovery of pregnancy and the repercussion of the news for the adolescent, the child's father and the family members; the positive and negative impacts of pregnancy on the adolescent's life and the context in which she lives and; adolescent expectations regarding the present and future. The data obtained with the application of the techniques indicated that the young woman was not expecting pregnancy at the moment, as well as that although the participant seems not yet aware of the possible difficulties she will have after the birth of the child, family support is very important in relation to acceptance of the new condition of mother and the structure offered for the reception of the child.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".