Modernidade e Carnaval em Porto Alegre no Século XIXModernity and Carnivalat Porto Alegre in Century XIX
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente artigo tem como objetivo fazer uma análise acerca dos discursos sobre a modernidade veiculados pelos jornais que circulavam na capital da Província do Rio Grande. A partir do último quartel do século XIX, implementou-se uma nova forma de se brincar o carnaval em Porto Alegre: os préstitos e bailes promovidos pelas Sociedades Carnavalescas. Através desse novo carnaval, pretendia-se reformar a cidade – física e moralmente – para inserí-la no patamar das grandes metrópoles. Como esse discurso aparecia na imprensa da capital e era passado para a população da cidade? Isso é o que iremos analisar nesse artigo. Mãos a obra, então! Palavras-Chave: Modernidade. Carnaval. Cidade. Abstract: This article aims to make an analysis about the speeches on the modernity served by newspapers that circulated in the capital of the Province of Rio Grande. From the last quarter of the nineteenth century, put up a new way to play the carnival in Porto Alegre: The préstitos dances and promoted by companies carnavalescas. Through this new carnival, was to reform the city - physically and morally - to anchor it in the landing of large cities. How this speech appeared in the press of the capital and was passed to the city's population? This is what we will examine in this article. Hands to work, then! Keywords: Modernity. Carnival. City.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".