MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7120766581

Effect of maternal diet on micronucleus frequency in pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review

2023· dissertation· pt· W7120766581 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anny Katielle Laurindo ARAÚJO

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservational studyPregnancyData extractionSystematic reviewProtocol (science)MEDLINEGestational ageGestation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of diet on maternal and infant genetic levels has been reported in the literature. Diet-associated DNA damage, such as the presence of micronuclei (MN), may be related to an increased risk of developing chronic diseases such as cancer. There is particular concern about this damage during pregnancy as it may affect the newborn (NB). Thus, this review aims to summarize the primary evidence of the impact of diet on the frequency of MN in the mother-infant population. This review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number: CRD42022302401. For elaboration, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines were considered. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Science direct databases were used to search for observational studies. Google Scholar and manual search were required to perform the “grey literature” search. Inclusion criteria were observational studies that evaluated the diet consumed by pregnant women (without chronological and gestational age restriction) using a food consumption frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and investigated the frequency of MN in these women and their NBs. No restrictions were applied regarding year of publication and language. Data analysis and extraction was performed by three reviewers independently. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The co-occurrence of the terms included in the articles was verified and a synthesis was carried out for the main findings of the selected ones. The search strategy retrieved 4558 records. Of these, 13 were read in full and 5 were included in the review. Most studies were of the cohort type (n= 4) and were carried out in the European region. A total of 875 pregnant women and 238 newborns were evaluated. Despite insufficient evidence to confirm that the diet changes the frequency of MN, the included studies found possible effects on the consumption of fried red meat and processed meats and the adequate consumption of vegetables and polyunsaturated fats. Future research is needed so that we can understand the effects of diet on genetic stability and have evidence to help plan public policies on food and nutrition or reinforce protective dietary patterns for this and future generations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.008
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentFrench-language works237,207