MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7120775598

Histórias periféricas do bairro de São Miguel Paulista: a Biblioteca Pública Municipal Raimundo de Menezes como centro de memórias: Peripheral stories of the São Miguel Paulista neighborhood: the Raimundo de Menezes Municipal Public Library as a center of memories

2025· article· pt· W7120775598 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Keli Cardoso de Melo

Bibliographic record

VenueLatin American Theatre Review (The University of Kansas) · 2025
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Science and Libraries
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapital (architecture)ChapelQuarter (Canadian coin)Center (category theory)Public culture
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article aims to analyze a public library named Raimundo de Menezes (Biblioteca Pública Municipal Raimundo de Menezes) and its importance as a cultural and memory center in São Miguel Paulista, at eastern zone of São Paulo, Capital (zona leste de São Paulo). Futhermore, there is a 2024’ events analysis at the library, emphasis on two of them referring to public history: Festival of Memory (Festival da Memória – March) and the Patrimony Day (Jornada do Patrimônio – August), as well as a brief history about this library and São Miguel Paulista. Whose trajectory is based on popular movements and important buildings, such as the Chapel of São Miguel Arcanjo and the Companhia Nitro Química Brasileira (Nitro Chemistry Brazilian Company), and the efforts of independent collectives to preserve the Patrimony and residents’ memories. Keywords: Libraries. Public history. Social history. Memory. Patrimony. Periphery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0110.008
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLatin American Theatre Review (The University of Kansas)Same topicInformation Science and LibrariesFrench-language works237,207