Nursing care in the family group of children/adolescents with heart transplants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The familial relationship frequently are very hard to be understood, then to increase our perception it is important to know the concept and family structure, roles and how the members organize themselves and interact with each other. We aim to develop strategy for nursing care in the family group. In a qualitative approach, through the methodological framework of Loomis (1979). The group approach adopted to the family and child / adolescent cardiac transplant in a tertiary hospital in Fortaleza. The group process is divided by three phases: planning (goals), intervention (structure and process) and evaluation (results), as the main objective of the group were support / learning. The theoretical framework was driven using as the genogram assessment, by model of Calgary Family Assessment (MCAF). The volunteers selected to the study were 15 relatives of children / adolescents who underwent heart transplantation. However through the inclusion and exclusion criteria, remained eight relatives to folow up. The data collection was performed from June to September (2012). The data used for analysis were: descriptive report of the session (audio and photos recorded) and speeches of the volunteers in interview, using the construction of the genogram. At each session, we identified the main therapeutic factors as: cohesion, catharsis, offering information, altruism, universality and instillation of hope that integrate the resolution process for their specific goals. The aims were achieved since we developed the strategy of the nursing care to the family group, using the reference group stages (group development), focusing on the proposed objective: support and learning. Furthermore the group and coordinator evaluation was assessed as being effective, since we could verify the phases from the perspective of the theory that constitute the curative factors in a group of health care that were identified in each session. To accomplish this nursing group practice in the hospital service, takes time and dedication to provide the nurse, that very often overwhelmed in service. We suggest that pediatric hospitals encourage their nurses to perform further research on nursing care in the family group and the child, as well as the nurse will be prepared and scientifically based practice, in order to provide satisfactory results to the institution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".