MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7121367184 · doi:10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20250395

Breeding report of a new seedling guava cultivar Suibai No.1

2025· article· zh· W7121367184 on OpenAlexaff
SHAO Xuehua, Qiao Yanchun, QUAN Linfa, HU Sifan, CHEN Jun, SHEN Siqiang, Liang Ziwei, Zhang Shoumei

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPsidium guajava Extracts and Applications
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCuttingCultivarSeedlingPetalGermplasmRootstockShoot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Suibai No.1 is a novel red-fleshed guava cultivar selected from local red-fleshed seedling populations in Guangzhou, distinguished by its comprehensive superior traits. It originated from an out-standing guava germplasm discovered in Zengcheng District, Guangzhou, in 2002, characterized by green peel, red flesh, tender texture, and a pronounced aroma. This germplasm was subsequently propagated by seed. In 2006,150 seedlings were obtained, which were transplanted to the Jiufo Experimental Base of the Guangzhou Institute of Pomology in 2007. Phenological, morphological, and fruit quality traits were systematically evaluated, leading to the selection of six elite individuals (B series). The top three genotypes were propagated by cuttings in 2008. By 2010, a batch of rooted cuttings was established at the same base for further trait observation. In 2017, scions from the clonally propagated B4 line-identified as the most promising genotype-were grafted onto pearl guava rootstocks for variety comparison and regional trials in Guangzhou. This genotype was officially released as Suibai No.1. The tree exhibits yellowish-brown and smooth bark, an upright growth habit, vigorous growth, and an open canopy. Mature trees reach a height of 2.15 m with a trunk circumference of 33.6 cm and a crown spread of 2.11 m×2.03 m. New shoots are green and quadrangular, becoming cylindrical after maturation. Leaves are light green when young, turning dark green at maturity; they are simple, opposite, and oblong-elliptic. Young branches are densely pubescent, becoming glabrous and dull grayish-brown with age. Flowers are solitary or in clusters of 2-3, with complete floral structure. The receptacle is yellow-green, petals are imbricate and white, filaments are slender, and the calyx is green, campanulate or pyriform, and persistent. Fruits have an average weight of 225.0 g and an oval shape (fruit shape index 1.19). The peel is glossy yellow-white; the flesh is white, tender, and smooth. Seeds are few, irregularly shaped, moderately hard, and light yellow. The flavor is sweet and sour with a strong aroma. Fruit biochemical composition includes soluble solids content (11.0%), soluble sugar (7.7 g·100 g-1), titratable acidity (3.16 g·kg-1), and vitamin C (176.6 mg·100 g-1). The fruit development period varies seasonally: 70-90 days from flowering to maturity in summer, and 110-130 days in winter. The cultivar shows resistance to anthracnose and tolerance to high temperatures, but is not cold-hardy. Annual fertilization is recommended 5-6 times. Seedlings should receive readily available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers, while mature trees should be fertilized according to tree size and fruit load. Flower and fruit thinning should be conducted in combination with production season management to improve fruit set. Bagging is recommended to protect against fruit flies, other pests, and birds. Suibai No.1 displays stable varietal traits following vegetative propagation. It is characterized by high yield stability, excellent fruit quality, desirable texture, and strong aroma, making it a valuable cultivar worthy of widespread promotion and cultivation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.470
GPT teacher head0.654
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicPsidium guajava Extracts and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207