MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7121905365 · doi:10.21659/cjad.92.v9n202

A Conversation with Prof François Colbert on Arts Management

2025· article· W7121905365 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Chitrolekha Journal on Art and Design · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedalThe artsConversationPerforming artsCraftQueen (butterfly)Ceremony

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

François Colbert is among the top scholars in arts marketing in the world, having published close to 200 works and being one of the most cited authors in his discipline. He is a professor of marketing and holder of the Carmelle and Rémi Marcoux Chair in Arts Management at HEC Montréal. He founded the Master in the Management of Cultural Organizations (in French) at HEC Montréal in 1988. He created and is currently the coordinator of the joint Master of Management in International Arts Management (HEC, SMU, Bocconi). He is the Founding Editor of the International Journal of Arts Management, published by the Chair in Arts Management. He has been the UNESCO Chair in Cultural Management from 2012 to 2018. In May 2002, he was awarded the Order of Canada for his achievements and unique contributions in developing the field of arts management. He also received the Queen Elizabeth II Golden Jubilee Medal (2002) and the Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee Medal (2012). He was made a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada in 2005. He received the ACE Award 2006 from the Association of Cultural Executives and the honorary title of “International Master” by the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology in 2018. He is also Honorary Professor at Peking University, the National Academy of Chinese Theatre Arts, as well as at the Tianjin Conservatory of Music in China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.006
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0120.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Chitrolekha Journal on Art and Design→Same topicCultural Industries and Urban Development→French-language works237,207→