MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7123240674

Integrating machine learning with scattering calculations to improve molecular collision observable predictions

2025· other· en· W7123240674 on OpenAlexaff
Xuyang Guo

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservableQuantumScatteringQuantum algorithmQuantum dynamicsCollisionGaussian processProbabilistic logic
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis demonstrates that machine learning can be integrated with rigorous quantum scattering calculations to improve predictions of molecular collision observables, a problem important to fields ranging from cold-atom physics to vacuum metrology. Rigorous quantum scattering calculations are limited by the fitting of high-dimensional potential energy surfaces (PES), the sensitivity of collision observables to the uncertainty in PES fitting, and the computational demands of achieving full convergence with large basis sets. The thesis begins by fitting polyatomic PES using Gaussian process (GP) regression built on quantum kernels. To provide an unbiased comparison between classical and quantum kernels, I develop an algorithm that uses an analog of the Bayesian information criterion to optimize the sequence of quantum gates, increasing the complexity of the quantum circuits incrementally. The algorithm achieves much higher PES fitting accuracy with fewer quantum gates than a fixed quantum circuit ansatz, matching state-of-the-art classical GP regression models. To examine the response of collision observables to the uncertainty in PES fitting, I employ rigorous quantum scattering calculations to perform a comprehensive analysis of the universality in thermal atom-atom collision rate coefficients. I demonstrate that the rate coefficients for heavy, highly polarizable atoms are insensitive to the variations in the interatomic interactions at short range. I provide phase diagrams separating universal from non-universal collisions by treating collision observables as probabilistic predictions determined by a distribution of interaction potentials. I then extend the analysis of the universality to atom-molecule collisions. I demonstrate that the rate coefficients of total (elastic + inelastic) atom-molecule scattering are insensitive to the interaction anisotropy of the underlying PES. Specifically, I show that the rate coefficients for Rb-H2 and Rb-N2 scattering at room temperature can be computed to 1% accuracy with the anisotropy set to zero, reducing the basis set size in coupled-channel quantum scattering calculations to the single-channel limit. To improve collision observables calculated with reduced basis sets, I present a basis-set extrapolation method for quantum scattering calculations based on GP regression. I demonstrate that the method can extrapolate fully converged collision observables using those calculated with reduced basis sets, with accuracy matching experimental requirements and theoretical approximations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→French-language works237,207→