Transmission Neural Networks: Approximate Receding Horizon Control for Virus Spread on Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transmission Neural Networks (TransNNs) proposed by Gao and Caines (2022) serve as both virus spread models over networks and neural network models with tuneable activation functions. This paper establishes that TransNNs provide upper bounds on the infection probability generated from the associated Markovian stochastic Susceptible-Infected-Susceptible (SIS) model with 2nstate configurations where n is the number of nodes in the network, and can be employed as an approximate model for the latter. Based on such an approximation, a TransNN-based receding horizon control approach for mitigating virus spread is proposed and we demonstrate that it allows significant computational savings compared to the dynamic programming solution to Markovian SIS model with 2nstate configurations, as well as providing less conservative control actions compared to the TransNNbased optimal control. Finally, numerical comparisons among (a) dynamic programming solutions for the Markovian SIS model, (b) TransNN-based optimal control and (c) the proposed TransNN-based receding horizon control are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".