MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Perturbation Analysis with Q-Noise in LQG Graphon Mean Field Games

2025· article· W7123342435 on OpenAlexaff
Tao Zhang, Peter E. Caines, Shuang Gao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicGame Theory and Applications
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerturbation (astronomy)EigenfunctionQuadratic equationGaussianMean field theoryLinear-quadratic-Gaussian controlSingular perturbation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a perturbation analysis for linear quadratic Gaussian graphon mean field games (LQGGMFGs) with Q-noise. The perturbation response function is derived under both initial-state and Q-noise perturbations within a finite horizon framework. The theoretical results show that the alignment of eigenfunctions between the graphon in the dynamics and the perturbation graphon determines the bounds of the perturbation response function. Numerical simulations validate these findings, demonstrating the impact of eigenfunction alignment on the system’s behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.014
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGame Theory and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207