MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7123349202 · doi:10.1109/esem64174.2025.00015

Toward Real-Time Intrusion Detection for Autonomous Vehicles: A Vision for Deep Learning-Based Security Frameworks

2025· article· W7123349202 on OpenAlexaff
Damiano Torre, Amirpasha Javid

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Canadian institutionsQuanser (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnomaly detectionIntrusion detection systemSoftwareSet (abstract data type)OverfittingSoftware systemSoftware security assurance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: AI-driven autonomous vehicles (AVs) combine machine learning, control systems, and embedded technologies, creating significant software engineering challenges, especially in securing cyber-physical systems. Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) are essential for detecting anomalies and cyberattacks in real time, thereby safeguarding AV operations. Aims: This vision paper aims to design and implement deep learning-based IDSs specifically tailored for real-time anomaly detection in autonomous drones, cars, and robots. Method: The approach begins with the development of platform-specific taxonomies of AV software vulnerabilities and a formal threat model. Controlled experiments will then be conducted using both physical aerial and ground vehicles, as well as industrial-grade simulators, in network-connected and isolated environments to generate labeled datasets of AV anomalies. These datasets will be used to design, train, and customize IDSs for each AV platform, which will subsequently be deployed on physical devices for evaluation under realistic conditions. Results: The work is expected to produce comprehensive taxonomies of AV software vulnerabilities, multiple labeled datasets capturing both normal and compromised AV behaviors, and a set of validated, deployable IDS frameworks tailored to various AV platforms. Conclusions: This study addresses core empirical software engineering challenges, such as the sim-to-real transfer gap in machine learning, risks of overfitting in data-driven IDS models, and hardware-software integration complexities. The anticipated outcome is a robust family of IDS solutions that enhance AV security in dynamic operational environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningFrench-language works237,207