MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7123351264 · doi:10.1109/mele.2025.3627082

Smarter Energy Management for Multistack Fuel Cells: Artificial intelligence coordination for heavy-duty transport.

2025· article· en· W7123351264 on OpenAlex
Razieh Ghaderi, Loïc Boulon, João Pedro F. Trovão, Minh C. Ta

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Electrification Magazine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designTruckEnergy managementWork (physics)Fuel cellsFault managementBattery (electricity)Applications of artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Imagine a freight truck crossing a continent not with one giant hydrogen fuel cell (FC), but with a team of smaller stacks, each quietly playing its part. Some work harder on uphill stretches, others rest when temperatures rise, and a few step in when a teammate begins to weaken. This is the vision behind multistack FC hybrid electric vehicles (MFCHEVs): modular systems in which several low-power FC stacks operate together with a battery to deliver traction power. Such architectures promise higher efficiency, improved durability, and enhanced fault tolerance. However, these benefits can only be realized through artificial intelligent (AI) energy management and effective coordination; otherwise, stacks may degrade unevenly, waste hydrogen, or fail prematurely.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.885

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it