MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mitigation of Single Event Effects (SEEs) Through TMR Implementation in Multi-Core Processors with LLM-Assisted Assembly Code Generation

2025· article· W7123363167 on OpenAlexaff
Aya Khaled Galal Mohammed, Zoya Ahmed, Otmane Aı̈t Mohamed, Abdelwahab Hamou‐Lhadj

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiation Effects in Electronics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMatrix multiplicationTriple modular redundancyRedundancy (engineering)Error detection and correctionRangingMultiplication (music)Modular designAssembly languageSoft errorFibonacci number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radiation can disrupt semiconductor devices, creating significant challenges for safety-critical computing. This work investigates multi-threaded Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR) as a mitigation strategy for radiation-induced soft errors in multi-core processors. The research has two primary objectives: (1) Develop and integrate a multi-threaded TMR approach tailored for a multicore processor, OpenPiton, leveraging its architectural features to enhance error detection and correction capabilities. (2) Leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) to automatically generate application-specific SPARCV9 assembly programs, for applications including Fibonacci Series (FS), Matrix Multiplication (MxM), 2D Image Convolution, and sequences with read-after-write (RAW) hazards. For evaluation, faults are injected systematically in the general-purpose register and the Error Correction Code (ECC) of a general-purpose register in one core, two cores, and three random cores and processor behavior with TMR protection is evaluated against the processor behavior without TMR protection. The proposed methodology demonstrates significant improvements of 13.5 % for the Fibonacci Series (FS), 20.4 % for Matrix Multiplication (MxM),$\text{1 3. 4 1 \%}$for RAW Hazards Sequence, and 9.35% for 2D Convolution of Images benchmarks, respectively. This is achieved with minimal time overhead, ranging from 5 % to 11 %, with no additional area overhead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadiation Effects in ElectronicsFrench-language works237,207