MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Existence Conditions for Stealthy Confidentiality of Discrete-Event Systems

2025· article· W7123369816 on OpenAlexafffund
Bryony H. Laporte, Karen Rudie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicPetri Nets in System Modeling
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEncryptionConfidentialitySet (abstract data type)Function (biology)CryptographyKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Confidentiality is a security model for discreteevent systems that uses an encryption function to obscure communications so the original information can be recovered by any agent with the decryption key. In this work we introduce the idea of stealthy confidentiality, namely when the set of possible behaviours of the encrypted system appears to be possible behaviours of the actual plant. We then present conditions that must be satisfied for stealthy confidentiality-enforcing encryption functions to exist under the assumptions from our previous work and under generalized assumptions that permit the existence of strings that are neither secret nor non-secret.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPetri Nets in System ModelingFrench-language works237,207